Indigenous-AI Collaborative Platform

INPUT SENT TO https://www.perplexity.ai/search/846749d5-85ec-41bf-8b22-d0f50113da01:

I sent <input>"""SI: AI in Research This section is solely for invited submissions to the AI in Research special issue. If you have not received an invitation to submit to that special issue, please submit your article through DHQ's regular submission process.

Submission Checklist *Required All submissions must meet the following requirements.

The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration. Prior publication through a personal blog or institutional repository is permitted, as are prior publications in languages other than English. Please include a comment in "Comments for the Editor" indicating why you feel this submission would be appropriate for republication. The submission conforms to the journal's AI policies. The submission was not authored using generative AI tools, except in minor ways as permitted in those policies. The bibliography has been checked and contains only citations of genuine publications. The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, TEI-XML, or DHQ-XML document file format. Citations have been provided as inline author-date references, with a full list of works cited at the end. Footnotes are used only for digressions and explanations. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Style Guidelines and Citation Guidelines, which are found on the DHQ web site. If this is a re-submission, the author has designated it as such in the "Author comments." The author affims that they have secured any permissions necessary for the use of images and other media, or that fair use applies. DHQ does not take responsibility for securing permissions. For the initial submission, all images should be embedded within the article for ease of reviewing. If the article is accepted for publication, with the final revised version we ask that all images and other media files be submitted as separate files, named figure01.jpg, figure02.jpg, etc. The location of each image must be clearly noted in the text and an appropriate caption (with credit information if necessary) should be provided."""

INFO: I created the attached file I attached so that part is ok, am I ready according to their guideline when choosing """SI: AI in Research""" or should I send a follow-up prompt to perplexity that would make changes happen.</input>

In relation to the attached file. I got <output>No — based on the text you pasted, you are not ready for "SI: AI in Research" regardless of manuscript quality, because that section is explicitly:

"solely for invited submissions"

and

"If you have not received an invitation ... submit through DHQ's regular submission process."

So the first gating question is not scholarly fit; it is:

Have you been invited to the AI in Research special issue?

Yes → continue with AI in Research.
No → submit through Articles (regular submission process).

Regarding the checklist

From what you've shown, you can likely check:

✅ Original work (you authored it)

✅ File format (assuming DOCX/RTF/etc.)

⚠️ AI policy compliance

⚠️ Citation format

⚠️ Bibliography verification

⚠️ Style guidelines

⚠️ Inline author-date references

⚠️ Permissions for images

These are the areas I would verify before submission.

The biggest risk

You mentioned earlier using Perplexity and AI assistance during development.

The checklist says:

"The submission was not authored using generative AI tools, except in minor ways as permitted in those policies."

This is the item I would investigate immediately.

Before submitting, I would answer:

Was AI used only for proofreading, search, and literature discovery?
Or did AI generate substantial prose that remains in the manuscript?

If the latter, you need to review DHQ's AI policy carefully before submission.

What I would do next

I would not ask Perplexity to rewrite the paper yet.

Instead, I would ask Perplexity (or me) a compliance audit question:

"Review this manuscript against DHQ submission requirements, especially author-date citations, bibliography validity, style compliance, and AI-authorship policy. Produce a checklist of deficiencies that must be corrected before submission."

That is likely more valuable than further content generation at this stage.

So my assessment is:

Submission readiness: ~70%

Administrative eligibility for "SI: AI in Research": 0% unless you have an invitation.

Most likely destination if not invited: Articles. </output>

from another conversation from EcoLune https://chatgpt.com/g/g-67ddd19aec688191ad608e43d4be6936-echolune/c/6a2693cd-22b0-83ea-a4fc-a416bd90a1d2

You will create a fully ready article for my work which will take the attached file to the next level ready for publication at https://openjournals.library.northeastern.edu/dhq/home/submission

You will supply also a section "Future Research" at the end that suggest other areas of inquiries with research question that would help expand this article coverage (you can use gap analysis todo that). This section might help also create other type of pages on the web that explores needed part for this article with referenced sources.

You can use our Notion.io pages as reference and suggest new pages we could create and publish as part of complementary work that would make this article acceptable.

Mia, I need to stop here and check your understanding of DHQ's submission categories before we proceed.

The attached file (file:1) is a Perplexity survey transcript about tmux and AI-enabled terminal multiplexing — this is not a manuscript ready for academic publication. It reads like internal research notes with voice-to-text transcription at the beginning.

To create a publication-ready DHQ article, I would need to:

Completely rewrite this content as formal academic prose
Add proper academic framing (literature review, research questions, methodology)
Convert inline citations to author-date format with full bibliography
Remove AI-generated voice (e.g., "Axon", conversational tone)
Integrate your other research files (Indigenous AI frameworks, Abundant Intelligences work, narrative architectures) into a cohesive argument
Add original empirical contribution (this survey alone is not sufficient)

Critical Decision Point

Before I proceed, you must clarify:

1. Have you been invited to submit to the "AI in Research" special issue?

Yes → we continue for that track
No → we target the regular Articles submission process

2. What is your intended article?

Option A: Transform this tmux survey into a full academic article about terminal-based AI agent architectures

Option B: Write a different article using your broader Indigenous AI research (files 2-9), with the tmux work as one case study

Option C: Something else entirely

3. AI authorship compliance

The checklist requires that the submission was "not authored using generative AI tools, except in minor ways as permitted in those policies."

How much of your final manuscript will be AI-generated vs. human-authored?
Should I help you audit existing content for DHQ AI policy compliance, or write new content that meets their requirements?

What I Can Do Right Now

If you confirm the direction, I will:

✅ Fetch DHQ's full submission guidelines and AI policy
✅ Analyze your 9 attached files for usable research
✅ Conduct gap analysis for missing scholarly components
✅ Generate a publication-ready manuscript in DHQ style
✅ Create a "Future Research" section with research questions
✅ Suggest Notion pages that would strengthen the submission

But I cannot proceed without knowing:

Your invitation status for "AI in Research"
Which article you actually want to publish
Your AI-authorship comfort zone within DHQ's policy

Please clarify these three points and I'll build exactly what you need.

Indigenous-AI Platform

#229 Submission preparation