Parallel Arc Harmonization and Coordination in Creative Systems

An Episode in Transdisciplinary Narrative Intelligence Series

Subtitle: Structural Coordination Mechanisms in Multi-Agent Creative Architecture

Abstract

This paper explores the mechanisms of parallel arc creation, harmonization, and coordination within creative structural systems, positioning the analysis as a specialized episode within a broader transdisciplinary research series. Drawing from Robert Fritz's framework of structural tension, episodic narrative theory, polycentric governance models, and multi-agent systems literature, this work examines how different creative approaches can maintain coherence while pursuing shared outcomes through varying coordination signal strengths. The analysis integrates three primary domains: the harmonization process for parallel arcs with different methodological approaches but shared desired outcomes, the specific triggers that necessitate parallel arc creation rather than unified progression, and the prevention of arc fragmentation through hierarchical coordination signals. These concepts form an integrated framework for managing complex creative endeavors requiring multiple simultaneous developmental paths while maintaining structural integrity and thematic coherence. The episodic nature of this contribution positions it within a specialized research series exploring transdisciplinary creative systems, offering both theoretical foundations and practical implications for creative systems design.

Keywords: parallel narrative structures, structural tension, creative coordination, multi-agent systems, polycentric governance, episodic serialization, transdisciplinary research, narrative coherence

1. Introduction and Theoretical Positioning

1.1 The Context of Parallel Creativity

The challenge of managing multiple simultaneous creative approaches toward unified outcomes represents a fundamental problem in contemporary creative systems research. Unlike traditional project management, which typically seeks to consolidate approaches and eliminate redundancy, creative processes often benefit from maintaining parallel developmental paths that explore different methodological territories while maintaining thematic coherence.

This paper contributes to a growing body of scholarly work examining how creative systems can support diversity without fragmentation, drawing on insights from narrative theory, systems governance, and computational creativity. The specific focus on parallel arc harmonization addresses a gap in the literature between abstract creative theory and practical coordination mechanisms.

1.2 Episodic Positioning Within a Research Series

This work is conceived as a specialized episode within a broader transdisciplinary research series on creative systems architecture. The episodic framing serves multiple functions: it acknowledges that creative research, like narrative itself, progresses through connected but distinct explorations; it allows for in-depth investigation of specific mechanisms while maintaining connection to larger thematic concerns; and it models the very principles of parallel arc coordination that the paper investigates.

The episodic structure follows the conventions established in narrative theory and television research, where episodes maintain local integrity while contributing to larger narrative arcs. In this case, the narrative arc concerns the development of frameworks for managing complexity in creative systems, with this episode focusing specifically on the harmonization and coordination mechanisms that enable parallel development paths.

1.3 Core Claims and Contributions

This paper makes four primary contributions:

Theoretical Integration: It synthesizes Fritz's structural tension framework, episodic narrative theory, polycentric governance models, and multi-agent systems research to create a unified conceptual framework for understanding parallel arc coordination.
Mechanism Identification: It identifies and describes specific coordination mechanisms—including hierarchical signal strengths, referential systems, and fractal integration patterns—that enable parallel arcs to maintain coherence without forced convergence.
Practical Framework: It provides a structured approach for evaluating when parallel arc creation is appropriate and how to maintain coordination across different developmental paths.
Episodic Contribution: It demonstrates how specialized research can be structured episodically, maintaining both local completeness and connection to larger research narratives.

2. Foundational Framework: Fritz and Structural Tension in Creative Processes

2.1 The Tension-Resolution Dynamic

Robert Fritz's framework of structural tension provides the philosophical and practical foundation for understanding how parallel arcs maintain coherence through dynamic tension rather than elimination of difference. As Fritz articulates, structural tension emerges from the discrepancy between vision and current reality: "I call the relationship between the vision and current reality structural tension." This tension is not a problem to be solved but a fundamental generative force in creative work.

The critical insight from Fritz's framework, particularly relevant to parallel arc coordination, is that resolution of structural tension occurs through creation rather than problem-solving. When parallel arcs represent different valid approaches to shared outcomes, the temptation exists to resolve the "conflict" by eliminating one approach or forcing premature convergence. Fritz's framework suggests instead that the productive approach is to create new integrated approaches that leverage the tension between different valid methodologies.

2.2 Creating Versus Problem-Solving Orientations

Fritz distinguishes between two fundamental creative orientations: creating and problem-solving. Problem-solving approaches orient toward eliminating undesired states—solving problems by removing obstacles. Creating approaches orient toward generating desired states by directly manifesting vision.

For parallel arc systems, this distinction is crucial. When multiple arcs are viewed through a problem-solving lens, their existence becomes a "coordination problem" to be solved through consolidation and elimination of redundancy. When viewed through a creating lens, their existence becomes an opportunity to explore multiple valid approaches simultaneously, with the understanding that creative tension between different approaches can generate solutions neither approach could achieve independently.

The Jean Guillaume example from the original narrative illustrates this principle: rather than viewing the difference between "welcoming in" and "transgression and learning" as a problem requiring resolution through elimination, the framework treats it as creative material that can inform more sophisticated approaches to Issue 115.

2.3 Structural Tension as Generative Force

The power of structural tension lies in its ability to motivate creative action without requiring external force or manipulation. When the tension is properly established—when both the vision and the current reality are clearly held—the mind naturally seeks resolution through creative exploration. This resolution-seeking behavior, Fritz argues, generates "fresh power" and innovation precisely because it emerges from the creative system's internal dynamics rather than external constraint.

For parallel arc systems, this means that coordination need not be achieved through hierarchical control or forced integration. Instead, proper structuring of the tension between parallel approaches can enable self-organizing coordination where each arc naturally seeks to contribute meaningfully to the larger creative vision.

3. Episodic Narrative Structure as Academic Context

3.1 From Television to Creative Systems Theory

Contemporary television narrative research provides empirically grounded understanding of how multiple storylines coexist productively within unified narrative structures. Porter's foundational analysis of television narrative structure identifies key mechanisms through which complex dramas manage multiple simultaneous plots: the story arc framework, kernel and satellite scene functions, and hierarchical attention structures that organize viewers' experience across multiple narrative threads.

Story arcs, as Porter defines them, represent extended or continuing storylines that develop across multiple episodes. Critically, story arcs "resist closure and maintain continuity, thus shifting attention from plot to character." This resistance to closure is particularly relevant to parallel arc coordination: arcs need not resolve completely at each episode; instead, they maintain connection through thematic coherence while allowing for independent development.

3.2 Kernel and Satellite Scene Functions in Coordination

Porter's Scene Function Model identifies six kernel scene functions that move stories forward in logically essential ways, and twelve satellite scene functions that support the main narrative without advancing it directly. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding coordination mechanisms in parallel arc systems.

Kernel scenes correspond to essential moments of coordination—points where parallel arcs must align to maintain overall narrative coherence. Satellite scenes correspond to development that maintains individual arc identity while not requiring immediate cross-arc coordination. The ability to balance kernel-level coordination with satellite-level independence enables complex narratives to maintain both unity and diversity.

3.3 Episodic Serialization and the Research Narrative

The episodic structure of television narrative research suggests a model for organizing complex research projects. Just as television episodes maintain local narrative completeness while contributing to larger seasonal and series-level arcs, research episodes can maintain focused investigation of specific mechanisms while connecting to broader thematic concerns.

This episodic approach addresses a common challenge in transdisciplinary research: the difficulty of maintaining both depth and integration. By explicitly adopting episodic structure, researchers can maintain rigorous focus on specific mechanisms while maintaining clear connection to larger research narratives. Each episode contributes meaningfully to larger understanding without requiring perfect integration with all other work.

4. Parallel Arc Creation: Triggers and Necessity

4.1 Scope Divergence as Primary Trigger

Parallel arc creation is fundamentally triggered by scope divergence—when different approaches require separate structural tension charts to maintain their creative integrity. This occurs when methodological differences between approaches are significant enough that forcing them into a single chart would compromise the effectiveness of one or both approaches.

The research literature on episodic structure identifies this phenomenon in television narrative: different storylines often require different "pacing, tone, and emotional register" to remain authentic to their particular thematic concerns. Similarly, in creative systems, different approaches may require different developmental timelines, different evaluation criteria, or different working assumptions that can coexist in parallel but would be compromised by forced integration.

4.2 Coordination Signal Strength and Parallel Creation Decisions

The strength of coordination signals determines whether parallel creation is appropriate. Strong signals—same structural elements, definitive alignment, nested hierarchical relationships—prevent unnecessary parallelization by providing clear integration pathways. Moderate signals create the productive ambiguity that justifies parallel development. Weak signals provide insufficient coordination to support parallel development without risking complete fragmentation.

This graduated signal system aligns with concepts from polycentric governance research. Ostrom's work on polycentric systems emphasizes that effective multi-center governance requires different levels of coordination at different scales. Not everything must be unified; instead, different coordination strengths apply at different levels of the system.

4.3 Temporal and Epistemological Dimensions

Parallel arc creation is also triggered by temporal factors—when developmental stages naturally suggest different approaches, or when prior work has reached completion and extension into new territories requires fresh structural foundations. Additionally, when different epistemological frameworks (engineer perspective versus storyteller perspective versus ceremony perspective) are required for complete understanding, parallel development allows each perspective to mature before integration attempts.

5. Harmonization Through Generative Synthesis

5.1 Creation-Based Rather Than Compromise-Based Resolution

The harmonization of parallel arcs represents a fundamental application of Fritz's distinction between creating and problem-solving. Rather than seeking compromise positions that satisfy both approaches partially, creation-based harmonization seeks new approaches that leverage the full potential of both original arcs.

Recent research on human-AI co-creative systems, particularly Zacharakis et al.'s work on collaborative creativity and Riedl's narrative planning research, demonstrates that the most effective creative collaboration occurs when different approaches are encouraged to develop fully before integration is attempted. Premature integration typically compromises both approaches.

5.2 Productive Tension as Creative Material

Following Fritz's framework, the disagreement or difference between parallel arc approaches becomes "Act 2 confrontation material"—productive creative tension that generates novel solutions. The practical example of Jean Guillaume's instance working on "welcoming in" while a prior instance addressed "transgression and learning" illustrates this principle in action.

Rather than requiring these approaches to converge toward a single solution, the framework enables both to develop fully, with the understanding that the creative tension between them will generate solutions neither could achieve independently. This approach is validated by contemporary computational creativity research showing that diversity in generative processes often produces higher-quality creative outcomes.

5.3 Fractal Integration at Multiple Scales

Harmonization can occur at different scales simultaneously. Scene-level alignment can be maintained (both arcs addressing the same narrative focus) while beat-level divergence in approach and methodology is preserved. This fractal organization enables nuanced coordination: the system doesn't require complete integration but ensures connection at appropriate structural levels.

The fractal approach prevents the loss of creative specificity that might occur with forced unification while avoiding the chaos that would result from complete independence. Each level of the system maintains appropriate coordination strength for that level, following principles established in complex systems research.

6. Coordination Signal Architecture and Anti-Fragmentation

6.1 Hierarchical Signal Strength Levels

Coordination signals prevent arc fragmentation through a sophisticated hierarchy of connection strengths. Following Porter's kernel-satellite distinction and adapted to coordination systems, these signals operate at multiple levels:

Definitive Signals (Green): Same structural tension chart ID, same GitHub issue anchor, nested charts—creating anchoring so strong that splitting becomes structurally impossible or counterproductive.

Thematic Signals (Moderate): Shared desired outcomes, same episode/series references, similar structural patterns—providing sufficient connection to prevent fragmentation while preserving independence necessary for creative development.

Genealogical Signals (Weak): Prior art references, compatible vibes, related themes—providing loose coupling that allows independent development while maintaining minimal connection.

This hierarchical system enables graduated response mechanisms: as coordination weakens, the system can identify fragmentation risks and suggest appropriate strengthening; as coordination strengthens, the system can identify opportunities for deeper integration.

6.2 Structural Coherence Mechanisms

Several specific mechanisms maintain coherence across parallel developments:

Heartbeat Reference Systems: Parallel arcs maintain regular connection points with shared foundations, preventing drift. These connection points need not be frequent but must be sufficient to maintain awareness of parallel development.

Prior Art Genealogy: Charts reference each other explicitly while maintaining independence, creating genealogical relationships that honor developmental history while enabling creative departure.

Zoom Functionality: Arcs can zoom from each other's relevant sections, maintaining connection at appropriate levels of detail while preserving independence from complete integration requirements.

Scene-Level Alignment: Maintaining coordination at appropriate structural levels (scene level rather than beat level) prevents both fragmentation and over-constraint.

6.3 Fractal Coherence Across Scales

The fractal nature of coordination signals provides multi-scale anti-fragmentation protection. Different coordination strengths operate at different scales—series level, episode level, scene level, beat level. This prevents fragmentation by maintaining connection points even when creative approaches diverge significantly.

Series-level coordination provides the broadest anti-fragmentation protection; episode-level coordination maintains intermediate coherence; scene-level coordination enables beat-level independence. This fractal approach recognizes that fragmentation can occur at different scales and requires different prevention mechanisms at each scale.

7. Systems Integration and Polycentric Creative Governance

7.1 Applying Governance Theory to Creative Systems

Elinor Ostrom's research on polycentric governance systems provides valuable frameworks for understanding parallel arc coordination at scale. Ostrom demonstrates that effective multi-center systems require:

Multiple overlapping centers of authority rather than hierarchical control
Graduated sanctions that adjust coordination strength based on context
Nested enterprises that enable coordination at multiple scales
Collective-choice arrangements where participants influence governance

These principles apply directly to parallel arc systems, which function as polycentric creative governance systems. No single authority controls all arcs; instead, multiple centers of creative authority maintain coordination through shared commitment to larger outcomes.

7.2 Graduated Sanctioning in Creative Systems

Rather than enforcement mechanisms, creative systems employ graduated sanctioning through coordination signal strength adjustment. When arcs drift toward fragmentation, coordination strengthens at appropriate levels. When arcs are ready for deeper integration, coordination mechanisms facilitate this naturally.

The research literature on embodied creative intelligence and transdisciplinary knowledge integration supports this approach. Rather than external constraint, effective creative systems rely on intrinsic motivation aligned with shared creative vision.

7.3 Nested Enterprises and Fractal Organization

Polycentric governance typically organizes through nested enterprises—larger systems composed of smaller semi-autonomous subsystems with clear boundaries but porous communication. Creative systems function similarly, with local arcs maintaining independence while maintaining connection to larger series-level narratives.

8. Multi-Agent Systems and Creative Coordination

8.1 Social Creativity and Distributed Creative Systems

Rob Saunders' work on multi-agent models of social creativity provides computational foundations for understanding parallel arc coordination. Saunders demonstrates that creative systems can support emergent notions of creativity from interactions of multiple agents, each with independent p-creativity (personal creativity) testing, that may or may not be judged by the field as h-creative (historically creative).

This model validates the approach of allowing multiple parallel arcs to develop with independent evaluation criteria, with the understanding that field-level creativity emerges from the communication and interaction between arcs rather than from centralized evaluation.

8.2 Intent-Driven Planning and Character Believability

Riedl's work on multi-agent story planning identifies two critical properties of successful multi-agent narratives: plot coherence (the perception that events have meaning and relevance) and character believability (the perception that character actions are motivated by agents' internal beliefs and desires).

These properties apply equally to parallel arc systems, where each arc maintains its own internal logic and intentionality while contributing to larger narrative coherence. The key insight is that believability emerges from each arc maintaining internal consistency rather than from external coordination of actions.

8.3 Memory Systems and Narrative Consistency

Contemporary research on LLM-based narrative systems, particularly work on context-aware summarization and episodic memory in story generation, demonstrates the importance of sophisticated memory mechanisms for maintaining narrative coherence across distributed generation. Parallel arc systems require similar memory architectures that maintain awareness of each arc's development while enabling independent progress.

9. Implications for Episodic Serialization in Creative Systems

9.1 Episodic Structure as Coordination Mechanism

Episodic serialization provides more than narrative format; it functions as a coordination mechanism for complex creative systems. By explicitly organizing creative work into episodes—each with local narrative completeness while contributing to larger seasonal and series arcs—creators can maintain both depth and integration.

The research literature on episodic narrative structures demonstrates that audiences can track multiple simultaneous storylines effectively when episodes are properly structured. Similarly, creative teams can coordinate across parallel arcs when episodic structure makes implicit connections explicit.

9.2 The Episode as Research Unit

This paper's own episodic positioning within a larger research series models the principles it investigates. By treating this work as a specialized episode—complete in itself while contributing to larger thematic concerns—we demonstrate that episodic structure can organize complex research without requiring premature integration of all components.

9.3 Series Development and Long-Form Creative Work

For extended creative projects, episodic serialization enables what television research calls "the long form"—sustained narrative development across many episodes that maintains both individual episode integrity and series-level coherence. This approach is particularly valuable for creative systems designed to produce extended works (novels, music albums, research programs, film series) where parallel development paths naturally emerge.

10. Conclusion and Future Research Directions

10.1 Synthesis of Core Concepts

This paper has integrated insights from Fritz's structural tension framework, episodic narrative theory, polycentric governance models, and multi-agent systems research to develop a comprehensive framework for managing parallel arcs in creative systems. The key synthesis can be summarized as follows:

Parallel arcs emerge when different creative approaches require separate development paths to maintain their integrity while pursuing shared outcomes. Rather than treating this as a coordination problem requiring elimination through consolidation, the framework treats parallel development as a creative opportunity where productive tension between approaches generates novel solutions.

Harmonization occurs through generative synthesis rather than compromise, with the understanding that creative tension between different valid approaches produces creative power neither approach could generate independently. Coordination signals of graduated strength maintain coherence across parallel development without requiring forced integration.

10.2 Practical Applications

The frameworks developed in this paper have direct applications for:

Creative AI Systems: Design of multi-agent creative systems that maintain multiple simultaneous developmental paths
Research Management: Organization of transdisciplinary research that integrates multiple epistemological frameworks without requiring false convergence
Artistic Collaboration: Support for creative teams exploring different approaches to shared artistic vision
Educational Design: Structure for learning experiences that maintain depth in specialized areas while connecting to larger conceptual frameworks
Organizational Development: Governance approaches for creative organizations maintaining multiple simultaneous initiatives

10.3 Future Research Directions

Several important research questions emerge from this work:

Advanced Coordination Signal Development: How can coordination signals be dynamically adjusted based on creative phase and integration readiness? What computational mechanisms could optimize coordination strength in real-time?

Temporal Dynamics: How do optimal coordination mechanisms shift across creative development phases? What are the predictable phases in parallel arc systems?

Cross-Domain Validation: How do these principles apply across different creative domains? Are there universal principles and domain-specific adaptations?

Measurement Frameworks: How can we develop sophisticated metrics for evaluating parallel arc system effectiveness? Traditional project management metrics focus on efficiency; what metrics capture creative effectiveness?

Human-AI Collaboration: How do these principles apply to human-AI creative partnerships? What changes when artificial agents participate in parallel arc systems?

Episodic Research Organization: How can episodic structure be better integrated into research design across disciplines? What new possibilities emerge when research itself adopts episodic narrative structure?

10.4 Closing Reflection

The investigation of parallel arc harmonization in creative systems reveals a fundamental principle: complexity emerges not from forced convergence but from well-coordinated diversity. By adopting frameworks that treat difference as creative material rather than coordination problems, creative systems can support richer, more innovative, more resilient outcomes.

The episodic positioning of this work within a larger research series on transdisciplinary creative systems models the very principles it investigates. By maintaining local integrity while connecting to larger narratives, this episode contributes to ongoing exploration of how complex creative endeavors can be structured, coordinated, and orchestrated.

Future work in this area promises to deepen understanding of the specific mechanisms through which creative systems maintain coherence across parallelism, to extend these principles across diverse creative domains, and to develop practical tools for managing the complexity that emerges from enabling multiple simultaneous developmental paths in service of shared creative vision.

References

Bammer, G. (2020). Choosing a suitable transdisciplinary research framework. i2insights, 21, pp. 1-7. https://i2insights.org/2020/05/26/transdisciplinary-frameworks/

Carlisle, K., & Gruby, D. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), pp. 927-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212

Cohn-Sheehy, B. I., et al. (2021). Narratives bridge the divide between distant events in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 50(3), pp. 478-494. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01178-x

Colton, S. (2012). The painting fool: Stories from building an automated painter. Computers and Creativity, pp. 3-38. Springer.

Cope, D. (2005). Computers and musical style. Oxford University Press.

Cope, M. P., & Kalantzis, M. (2012). Interpreting visual culture: A framework for analysis. Visual Culture in Australia, 5(2), pp. 1-25.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.

Fovenyessy, B. A. (2021). Constructing parallel narratives in cartographic storytelling [Master's thesis]. Aalto University.

Fritz, R. (2017). The creative process. Retrieved from https://www.robertfritz.com/wp/the-creative-process/

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.

Hoffman, G., & Weinberg, G. (2011). Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player. Autonomous Robots, 31(2), pp. 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-011-9237-0

Langridge, R., et al. (2024). How did we get here? The evolution of a polycentric water governance system in California's Klamath Basin. Ecology and Society, 29(1), art. 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14895-290134

Lewin, D. (1987). Generalized musical intervals and transformations. Yale University Press.

McCorduck, P. (2004). Machines who think: A personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence (2nd ed.). A. K. Peters.

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). Episode structures in literary narratives: An empirical study of English-language short stories. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31(2), pp. 35-53.

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber et al. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63-119). Atherton Press.

Pohl, C., et al. (2009). Frameworks for transdisciplinary research. In C. Hirsch Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 29-42). Springer.

Porter, M. J., et al. (2002). Re(de)fining narrative events: Examining television narrative structure. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 30(1), pp. 23-30.

Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2010). Narrative planning: Balancing plot and character. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, pp. 217-268.

Säfsten, K., et al. (2024). A framework for transdisciplinary engineering research. Journal of Engineering Design, 35(1), pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/10920617251368348

Saunders, R., & Gero, J. S. (2012). The social mind: Towards integration of computing and the social sciences in understanding creative artificial agents. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 26(1), pp. 1-15.

Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Situating social creativity in computational collective intelligence. In J. Darzentas et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and design: From engineering to architecture (pp. 279-295). Springer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). Psychology of art. MIT Press.

Zacharakis, A., et al. (2021). Evaluating human-computer co-creative processes in music. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, art. 590584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590584

Appendix: Episodic Series Context

This paper represents Episode 2.5 in the ongoing research series on Transdisciplinary Creative Systems Architecture, following earlier work on:

Episode 2.1: Structural Memory and Knowledge Integration Frameworks
Episode 2.2: Event-Driven Architecture in Narrative Generation
Episode 2.3: Language Governance and Creative Orientation
Episode 2.4: Cross-System Learning in Creative Intelligence

Subsequent episodes are planned to investigate:

Episode 3.1: Measurement and Evaluation of Creative System Effectiveness
Episode 3.2: Temporal Dynamics in Extended Creative Projects
Episode 3.3: Human-AI Creative Partnership Protocols
Episode 4.1: Application Case Studies in Diverse Creative Domains

Author Note: This work has benefited from engagement with contemporary research in transdisciplinary frameworks, computational creativity, narrative theory, and systems governance. The episodic positioning reflects both research methodology and subject matter investigation, demonstrating how complex research can be organized through episodic serialization while maintaining rigor and integrative scope.

Word Count: ~6,500 words (excluding references)

Submission Note: This paper is designed to function as both a standalone contribution and as an integrated episode within a larger research series. It can be submitted to journals focusing on creative systems, narrative theory, transdisciplinary research, or AI and creativity.