← Back to Articles & Artefacts
artefactswest

Mac Mini M4 Hardware for Local AI Inference (Ollama/OpenClaw)

IAIP Research
rch-tech-jgwill-claws-infrastructure

Mac Mini M4 Hardware for Local AI Inference (Ollama/OpenClaw)

Research Date: April 15, 2026 Scope: Hardware specifications, benchmarks, and pricing for local LLM inference only (no training/fine-tuning) Context: Guillaume Descoteaux-Isabelle plans to run OpenClaw/Ollama locally alongside an OpenAI Codex subscription


Key Findings

  1. Mac Mini ships with M4 and M4 Pro only — no M4 Max. If you need M4 Max (128GB, 546 GB/s bandwidth), you must buy a Mac Studio (~$2,499–$2,999).
  2. Memory bandwidth is THE bottleneck for LLM inference, not GPU cores or Neural Engine. M4: 120 GB/s, M4 Pro: 273 GB/s, M4 Max: 546 GB/s. This directly determines tokens/second.
  3. Scenario A (7B–14B models) is well-served by a Mac Mini M4 with 24GB RAM at $699–$999. Llama 3.1 8B Q4 runs at 28–35 tok/s; plenty of headroom for dev tools.
  4. Scenario B (40GB+ models like 70B Q4) requires Mac Mini M4 Pro with 64GB RAM at $1,999–$2,199. Llama 3.1 70B Q4_K_M runs at 6–8 tok/s — usable but not fast. The model alone needs ~38GB RAM.
  5. Ollama 0.19+ uses MLX backend on Apple Silicon (March 2026), delivering up to 87% faster decode speeds vs the old llama.cpp Metal backend.
  6. Unified memory is Apple Silicon's killer advantage: CPU and GPU share the full memory pool. No VRAM limit like discrete GPUs. A 64GB M4 Pro can load a 70B Q4 model that would require a $10,000+ multi-GPU setup on NVIDIA.
  7. Thermal throttling is a real concern for sustained inference on Mac Mini. Under 100% GPU/CPU load, stock cooling can throttle within 8–10 minutes, dropping performance 30–45%. External cooling solutions help significantly.
  8. macOS + dev tools (VS Code, Docker, browser) consume 8–14GB RAM, leaving ~10GB on 24GB and ~50GB on 64GB for models.
  9. Storage: budget 50–100GB for a typical collection of Ollama models. Individual models range from 1.7GB (Phi-2) to 38GB (Llama 70B Q4_K_M).
  10. M4 Pro 64GB Mac Mini at $1,999 is the best price/performance for serious local AI work. It covers 95% of use cases short of 70B+ FP16 models.

Mac Mini M4 Lineup (April 2026)

Important: The Mac Mini is available with M4 and M4 Pro chips only. There is no Mac Mini with M4 Max. For M4 Max, you need a Mac Studio ($2,499+) or MacBook Pro.

Chip Specifications

SpecM4 (Base)M4 Pro (12-core)M4 Pro (14-core)
CPU Cores10 (4P + 6E)12 (8P + 4E)14 (10P + 4E)
GPU Cores101620
Neural Engine16-core, 38 TOPS16-core, 38 TOPS16-core, 38 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth120 GB/s273 GB/s273 GB/s
Max Unified Memory32 GB64 GB64 GB
Max Storage2 TB8 TB8 TB
ThunderboltTB4 (×3)TB5 (×3)TB5 (×3)
EthernetGigabit (10GbE opt.)10 Gigabit10 Gigabit

Complete Pricing Table (Apple MSRP, USD)

Mac Mini M4 (Base Chip)

RAMStoragePrice (MSRP)
16 GB256 GB$599
16 GB512 GB$799
24 GB256 GB$699*
24 GB512 GB$999
24 GB1 TB~$1,049*
32 GB512 GB~$1,199*

CTO (Configure to Order) pricing — approximate based on upgrade costs: +$200 for 24GB, +$400 for 32GB RAM; +$200 per SSD tier.

Mac Mini M4 Pro (12-core CPU / 16-core GPU — base Pro)

RAMStoragePrice (MSRP)
24 GB512 GB$1,399
24 GB1 TB$1,599
48 GB512 GB$1,799
48 GB1 TB$1,999
64 GB512 GB$1,999
64 GB1 TB$2,199
64 GB2 TB$2,599

Mac Mini M4 Pro (14-core CPU / 20-core GPU — upgraded Pro)

RAMStoragePrice (MSRP)
24 GB1 TB$1,799
48 GB1 TB$2,199
64 GB1 TB$2,399

The 14-core/20-core Pro is a CTO upgrade that adds ~$200 to the 12-core base.

Upgrade Cost Summary

UpgradeCost
24GB → 48GB RAM (Pro)+$400
24GB → 64GB RAM (Pro)+$600
16GB → 24GB RAM (base)+$200
16GB → 32GB RAM (base)+$400
512GB → 1TB SSD+$200
512GB → 2TB SSD+$600
1TB → 4TB SSD (Pro)+$1,000
10GbE Ethernet (base)+$100

RAM is soldered and cannot be upgraded after purchase. Choose wisely.


Apple Silicon Unified Memory: Why It Matters for LLMs

The Architecture Advantage

Traditional PC setups have separate CPU RAM and GPU VRAM. An NVIDIA RTX 4090 has only 24GB VRAM — a 70B Q4 model (38GB) simply won't fit without multi-GPU setups costing $10,000+.

Apple Silicon uses unified memory architecture (UMA):

  • CPU and GPU share the same physical memory pool
  • No data copying between CPU and GPU memory (zero-copy)
  • The entire memory pool is accessible to the GPU for model weights
  • A 64GB Mac Mini M4 Pro gives the GPU access to all 64GB — minus OS overhead

Memory Bandwidth Is King

LLM inference is memory-bandwidth-bound, not compute-bound. Every token generated requires reading the entire model's weights from memory. The formula:

Theoretical max tok/s ≈ Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) / Model Size in Memory (GB)
ChipBandwidth7B Q4 (4GB)13B Q4 (8GB)34B Q4 (19GB)70B Q4 (38GB)
M4120 GB/s~30 tok/s~15 tok/s~6 tok/sN/A (RAM limit)
M4 Pro273 GB/s~68 tok/s~34 tok/s~14 tok/s~7 tok/s
M4 Max*546 GB/s~136 tok/s~68 tok/s~29 tok/s~14 tok/s

M4 Max not available in Mac Mini — requires Mac Studio.

Real-world performance is typically 60–80% of theoretical due to attention computation, KV cache, and system overhead.


Memory Requirements by Model Size

RAM Needed for Inference (Q4_K_M Quantization)

ModelParametersQuantModel RAM+ KV Cache (4K ctx)Total RAM NeededDisk Space
Phi-22.7BQ4~1.7 GB~0.3 GB~2 GB1.7 GB
Phi-3 Mini3.8BQ4~2.3 GB~0.4 GB~3 GB2.3 GB
Llama 3.1 8B8BQ4_K_M~4.5 GB~0.5 GB~5 GB4.6 GB
Mistral 7B7BQ4_K_M~4.1 GB~0.5 GB~5 GB4.1 GB
CodeLlama 7B7BQ4_K_M~4.0 GB~0.5 GB~5 GB4.0 GB
Llama 3.1 8B8BQ8_0~8.5 GB~0.5 GB~9 GB8.5 GB
CodeLlama 13B13BQ4_K_M~7.9 GB~0.8 GB~9 GB7.9 GB
DeepSeek-Coder 6.7B6.7BQ4_K_M~3.8 GB~0.5 GB~4 GB3.8 GB
Mixtral 8x7B (MoE)46.7B eff.Q4_K_M~18 GB~1.5 GB~20 GB26 GB
CodeLlama 34B34BQ4_K_M~19 GB~1.2 GB~20 GB19 GB
DeepSeek-Coder 33B33BQ4_K_M~19 GB~1.2 GB~20 GB19 GB
Llama 3.1 70B70BQ4_K_M~38 GB~2.5 GB~41 GB38 GB
Llama 3.1 70B70BQ8_0~72 GB~2.5 GB~75 GB72 GB

Notes:

  • KV cache grows with context length. At 32K context, a 70B model's KV cache can reach ~10–20GB
  • TurboQuant (2026) compresses KV cache 5× with negligible quality loss, making 70B at 32K context viable on 64GB
  • "Total RAM Needed" is the minimum — add OS + apps overhead (8–14GB) for real-world requirement

OS + Development Tools Memory Budget

ComponentTypical RAMHeavy Usage
macOS system3–5 GB5–7 GB
VS Code / Cursor1–2 GB3–5 GB
Docker Desktop2–4 GB8–16 GB
Browser (10–20 tabs)1–4 GB5–8 GB
Terminal / misc0.5–1 GB1–2 GB
Total dev overhead8–14 GB16–30 GB

Available RAM for Models by Configuration

Mac Mini ConfigTotal RAMOS + Dev ToolsAvailable for Models
M4, 16 GB16 GB~10 GB~6 GB (7B Q4 only)
M4, 24 GB24 GB~10 GB~14 GB (up to 13B Q4)
M4, 32 GB32 GB~10 GB~22 GB (up to 34B Q4 tight)
M4 Pro, 24 GB24 GB~10 GB~14 GB (up to 13B Q4)
M4 Pro, 48 GB48 GB~12 GB~36 GB (34B Q4 comfortable, 70B Q4 very tight)
M4 Pro, 64 GB64 GB~12 GB~52 GB (70B Q4_K_M with room to spare)

Scenario A: Minimal Inference Setup

Goal

Run small/medium models (7B–14B parameters) via Ollama for coding assistance, chat, and general development, alongside standard dev tools.

Target Models

  • Llama 3.1 8B / Llama 3.2 3B
  • Mistral 7B / Mistral Nemo 12B
  • Phi-3 Mini (3.8B) / Phi-3 Medium (14B)
  • CodeLlama 7B / DeepSeek-Coder 6.7B
  • Qwen 2.5 7B

Recommended Configuration

Mac Mini M4, 24GB RAM, 512GB SSD — $999 MSRP

SpecDetail
ChipM4, 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU
RAM24 GB unified memory
Storage512 GB SSD (1 TB recommended for comfort: $1,049)
Bandwidth120 GB/s
Price$999 (or $699 with 256GB SSD)

What It Can Run

ModelSize on DiskRAM UsedPerformance (tok/s)Verdict
Llama 3.1 8B Q4_K_M4.6 GB~5 GB28–35✅ Excellent
Mistral 7B Q4_K_M4.1 GB~5 GB28–35✅ Excellent
CodeLlama 7B Q4_K_M4.0 GB~5 GB28–35✅ Excellent
Phi-3 Mini Q42.3 GB~3 GB40–50✅ Very fast
DeepSeek-Coder 6.7B Q43.8 GB~4 GB30–38✅ Excellent
Qwen 2.5 7B Q44.0 GB~5 GB28–35✅ Excellent
Llama 3.1 8B Q8_08.5 GB~9 GB18–22✅ Good
CodeLlama 13B Q4_K_M7.9 GB~9 GB8–12⚠️ Usable, slower
Mixtral 8x7B Q4_K_M26 GB~20 GBN/A❌ Won't fit with dev tools

With MLX Backend (Ollama 0.19+)

The MLX backend (default since March 2026) provides significant speedups on Apple Silicon:

  • 7B Q4 models: 45–60 tok/s (vs 28–35 with old Metal backend)
  • Smaller models (1B–3B): 200–460+ tok/s

Limitations

  • Cannot run 30B+ models (insufficient RAM after OS/dev tools)
  • 13B models work but leave little headroom for context or multitasking
  • 512GB storage fills up if you download many models — consider 1TB
  • Memory bandwidth (120 GB/s) is the main performance limiter vs M4 Pro

Budget Alternative

Mac Mini M4, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD — $599 can run 7B Q4 models, but with only ~6GB free RAM after OS, it's tight. One model at a time, short context only. Not recommended for a developer who also runs Docker/browsers.


Scenario B: Evolved Large Model Setup

Goal

Run large models (~40GB Ollama models) including Llama 3.1 70B Q4, DeepSeek-Coder 33B, Mixtral 8x7B, alongside full development environment.

Target Models

  • Llama 3.1 70B Q4_K_M (~38 GB on disk, ~41 GB RAM)
  • DeepSeek-Coder 33B Q4_K_M (~19 GB on disk, ~20 GB RAM)
  • Mixtral 8x7B Q4_K_M (~26 GB on disk, ~20 GB RAM)
  • CodeLlama 34B Q4_K_M (~19 GB on disk, ~20 GB RAM)

Recommended Configuration

Mac Mini M4 Pro (12-core), 64GB RAM, 1TB SSD — $2,199 MSRP

SpecDetail
ChipM4 Pro, 12-core CPU, 16-core GPU
RAM64 GB unified memory
Storage1 TB SSD (2 TB for model library: $2,599)
Bandwidth273 GB/s
Price$2,199

Why Not 48GB?

A 48GB configuration ($1,799–$1,999) can technically load Llama 70B Q4_K_M (38GB model + 2.5GB KV cache = ~41GB), but after macOS + dev tools (~12GB), you'd have only ~36GB free — the model won't fit. 64GB is required for 70B models when running alongside development tools.

48GB IS viable for: DeepSeek-Coder 33B, Mixtral 8x7B, CodeLlama 34B (all ~20GB loaded). These fit comfortably with dev tools on 48GB.

Is M4 Pro Enough, or Do You Need M4 Max?

M4 Pro (64GB) is sufficient for Scenario B — but with caveats:

FactorM4 Pro 64GBM4 Max 128GB (Mac Studio)
Can load 70B Q4?✅ Yes (~41GB model + 12GB OS = 53GB)✅ Yes, with massive headroom
70B tok/s6–8 tok/s14–20 tok/s
70B at 32K context?⚠️ Tight — needs TurboQuant✅ Comfortable
Run 2 large models?❌ No room✅ Yes
Price$2,199~$2,999+ (Mac Studio)
Form factorMac Mini 5×5"Mac Studio (larger)

Verdict: M4 Pro 64GB is enough if you run one large model at a time with moderate context (<8K tokens default, up to 32K with TurboQuant). For heavy multi-model or long-context work, the Mac Studio M4 Max is the next step.

What It Can Run

ModelSize on DiskRAM UsedPerformance (tok/s)Verdict
Llama 3.1 70B Q4_K_M38 GB~41 GB6–8✅ Usable for single-user chat
DeepSeek-Coder 33B Q419 GB~20 GB10–14✅ Good for coding
Mixtral 8x7B Q4_K_M26 GB~20 GB12–18✅ Good, MoE efficiency
CodeLlama 34B Q4_K_M19 GB~20 GB10–14✅ Good for coding
Llama 3.1 8B Q4_K_M4.6 GB~5 GB35–45✅ Blazing fast
Multiple 7B models concurrent~10 GB~12 GB25–35 each✅ Multiple models at once
Llama 3.1 70B Q8_072 GB~75 GBN/A❌ Exceeds 64GB

Storage Considerations

With large models, storage matters:

  • Minimum 1TB SSD — a typical collection of 5–8 models (mix of 7B and 70B) needs 80–150GB
  • 2TB recommended if you plan to keep many model variants downloaded
  • Ollama stores models in ~/.ollama/models/
  • Models can be deleted and re-downloaded as needed

Upgrade Path

If Scenario B proves insufficient, the next step is a Mac Studio M4 Max with 128GB ($2,499–$2,999):

  • 128GB unified memory at 546 GB/s bandwidth
  • Llama 70B Q4 at 14–20 tok/s (2–3× faster than M4 Pro)
  • Can run 70B at FP16 (~4.5 tok/s) or multiple large models concurrently
  • Better sustained thermal performance in the larger Studio enclosure

Benchmark Data

Tokens/Second by Chip and Model (Q4_K_M, Ollama with MLX backend)

ModelM4 (24GB)M4 Pro (48–64GB)M4 Max (128GB)*
Phi-3 Mini 3.8B50–6570–90120–150
Llama 3.1 8B28–3535–4555–60
Qwen 2.5 7B28–3535–4555–60
Mistral 7B28–3535–4555–60
CodeLlama 13B8–1214–1822–28
DeepSeek-Coder 33BN/A10–1418–22
Mixtral 8x7BN/A12–1825–28
Llama 3.1 70B Q4N/A6–818–20
Llama 3.1 70B FP16N/AN/A~4.5

M4 Max only available in Mac Studio or MacBook Pro, not Mac Mini.

MLX Backend Speed Improvements (Ollama 0.19+, March 2026)

The MLX backend (now default in Ollama) provides dramatic speed improvements over the previous llama.cpp Metal backend:

Modelllama.cpp (old)MLX (new)Improvement
Qwen3 0.6B Q4281 tok/s526 tok/s+87%
Llama 3.2 1B Q4331 tok/s462 tok/s+39%
Qwen3 8B Q477 tok/s93 tok/s+21%
Llama 3.1 8B Q4~35 tok/s~45 tok/s~29%

Benchmarks from M4 Max 128GB; proportional improvements apply to M4 and M4 Pro.

Prompt Processing (Prefill) Speed

Prompt processing is much faster than token generation:

  • M4 24GB, Llama 3.2 8B: 326 tok/s prompt ingestion
  • This means a 1000-token prompt is processed in ~3 seconds

Comparison with NVIDIA GPUs

HardwareLlama 70B Q4 tok/sCostPower
Mac Mini M4 Pro 64GB6–8$2,199~50W
RTX 4070 Super (12GB)~12*~$600 GPU + PC~300W
RTX 4090 (24GB)Can't load 70B~$1,600 GPU~450W
2× RTX 4090 (48GB)~20~$5,000+ system~900W
Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB18–20~$2,999~75W

RTX 4070 requires offloading layers to CPU RAM, severely degrading performance for 70B.


Thermal and Sustained Performance

Mac Mini M4 Pro Stock Cooling

The Mac Mini's compact 5×5-inch form factor presents thermal challenges for sustained AI inference:

Workload TypeTemperatureTime to ThrottlePerformance Impact
Light use (browsing, coding)60–75°CNo throttlingFull performance
CPU-heavy batch work68–74°CNo throttling<3% drop (stable)
LLM inference (sustained 100%)95–118°C8–10 minutes30–45% drop
LLM with external fan85–100°C~25 minutes10–20% less throttling

Practical Implications

For interactive chat/coding assistant use (Scenario A & B typical):

  • Queries are bursty — a few seconds of inference, then idle
  • Thermal throttling is not an issue for interactive use
  • The Mac Mini will stay cool and quiet for normal Ollama usage

For sustained batch inference (e.g., processing documents, multi-agent hosting):

  • Stock cooling will throttle within 10 minutes
  • Performance plateaus at 55–70% of peak after throttling
  • External cooling solutions (small rear blower fan, ~$20–30) extend full-performance window to ~25 minutes

Mitigation Strategies

  1. External fan ($20–30): Placed behind the Mac Mini, reduces temps by ~10°C
  2. Software fan control (free): Max internal fan reduces temps but increases noise
  3. Ambient temperature: Keeping room at 20–22°C measurably helps
  4. Thermal pad mod (voids warranty): +15% heat dissipation, not recommended
  5. Duty cycle management: If doing batch work, schedule pauses every 20–30 minutes

Verdict

For Guillaume's use case (interactive Ollama queries alongside development), thermal throttling will not be a practical concern. It only matters for continuous 24/7 batch inference workloads.


Evidence Quality

Well-Sourced (High Confidence)

FindingSource Quality
Mac Mini configurations and pricingApple official specs page, multiple retailers (B&H, Amazon)
M4/M4 Pro/M4 Max chip specificationsApple official, verified by Notebookcheck, AnandTech
No M4 Max in Mac MiniApple official, confirmed by MacRumors, 9to5Mac
Memory bandwidth figuresApple official silicon specs
RAM requirements per model sizeOllama documentation, llama.cpp community calculations, verified empirically
Ollama MLX backend (0.19+)Ollama official blog, March 2026

Community-Validated (Medium-High Confidence)

FindingSource Quality
Tokens/second benchmarksMultiple independent user reports (Reddit r/LocalLLaMA, r/ollama), consistent across sources
70B Q4_K_M at 6–8 tok/s on M4 Pro 64GBMultiple benchmark sites + community reports; cross-validated with bandwidth formula
MLX speed improvements (87% for small models)DEV Community benchmarks, Ollama blog, multiple user confirmations
OS + dev tools RAM consumption (8–14GB)Hacker News survey, community reports, consistent with macOS Activity Monitor data

Less Certain (Medium Confidence)

FindingSource Quality
Thermal throttling at 8–10 minutesBased on a few detailed test reports; real-world varies by ambient temp and workload
118°C peak GPU temp under max loadExtreme case from one test; typical sustained is 95–105°C
TurboQuant KV cache compression for 70B@32K on 64GBNew technique (2026); early benchmarks promising but not widely validated yet
M4 Pro 14-core/20-core pricingCTO pricing varies; some retailer listings inconsistent

Speculative (Low Confidence)

FindingSource Quality
Future Ollama/MLX optimizations beyond 0.19Based on trajectory; no confirmed roadmap
M5 chip timeline for Mac Mini refreshRumors only as of April 2026

Sources

Apple Official

  1. Apple Mac Mini Specs Pagehttps://www.apple.com/mac-mini/specs/
  2. Apple Mac Mini Buy Pagehttps://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-mini
  3. Apple Newsroom: Mac Mini M4 Announcementhttps://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/10/apples-new-mac-mini-is-more-mighty-more-mini-and-built-for-apple-intelligence/

Benchmarks & Technical Analysis

  1. Sean Kim, "M4 Max AI Inference Benchmarks"https://blog.imseankim.com/apple-m4-max-macbook-pro-ai-inference-benchmarks/
  2. OwnYourAI, "Apple Silicon for Local AI: M4, M4 Pro, M4 Max Compared"https://ownyourai.dev/hardware/apple-silicon-for-ai/
  3. DEV Community, "Apple Silicon LLM Inference Optimization Guide"https://dev.to/starmorph/apple-silicon-llm-inference-optimization-the-complete-guide-to-maximum-performance-3388
  4. LocalAI Computer, "Mac Mini M4 Pro for Local AI"https://localai.computer/products/systems/mac-mini-m4-pro
  5. TurboQuant Benchmark on Apple Siliconhttps://asiai.dev/turboquant/
  6. llama.cpp Performance Discussion on Apple Siliconhttps://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/4167

Ollama

  1. Ollama Blog, "Ollama is now powered by MLX"https://ollama.com/blog/mlx
  2. DEV Community, "Ollama Just Got 93% Faster on Mac"https://dev.to/alanwest/ollama-just-got-93-faster-on-mac-heres-how-to-enable-it-3gce

Community & Reviews

  1. Reddit r/ollama, Mac Mini M4 as Ollama serverhttps://www.reddit.com/r/ollama/comments/1idv02o/has_anyone_been_using_the_base_m4_mac_mini_as_an/
  2. MacRumors, Mac Mini Rounduphttps://www.macrumors.com/roundup/mac-mini/
  3. PCMag, Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro Reviewhttps://www.pcmag.com/reviews/apple-mac-mini-2024-m4-pro
  4. yW!an, "Local LLM Performance: The 2025 Benchmark"https://www.ywian.com/blog/local-llm-performance-2025-benchmark
  5. RunAI Guide, "Mac Mini M4 vs M2 Ollama Speed Test"https://www.runaiguide.com/mac-mini-m4-vs-m2-ollama-speed-test-with-qwen-35-models

Thermal

  1. VPSMac, "Mac mini Thermal Performance 72-Hour Stress Test"https://vpsmac.com/en/blog/mac-mini-thermal-performance-stress-test.html
  2. Apple Community Forums, M4 Pro thermalshttps://discussions.apple.com/thread/255854367

Pricing

  1. MacPrices.nethttps://www.macprices.net/mac-mini/
  2. AppleInsider Mac Mini Dealshttps://appleinsider.com/deals/best-mac-mini-deals
  3. SimplyMac, Mac Mini Upgrade Optionshttps://www.simplymac.com/mac/mac-mini-upgrade
  4. B&H Photo, Mac Mini M4 Pro configurationshttps://www.bhphotovideo.com/

Quick Decision Matrix

Your NeedRecommendationPrice
Run 7B models for coding assist, tight budgetMac Mini M4, 24GB, 256GB$699
Run 7B–13B models comfortably with dev toolsMac Mini M4, 24GB, 512GB$999
Run 7B–13B with future headroomMac Mini M4, 32GB, 512GB~$1,199
Run 33B–34B models + MoE modelsMac Mini M4 Pro, 48GB, 1TB$1,999
Run 70B models + full dev environmentMac Mini M4 Pro, 64GB, 1TB$2,199
Run 70B models fast + multiple large modelsMac Studio M4 Max, 128GB~$2,999

For Guillaume Specifically

Start with Scenario A ($999) if:

  • Your primary AI work uses OpenAI Codex subscription (cloud)
  • Local models are supplementary (private queries, offline work, experimentation)
  • 7B–8B models cover your local needs

Go directly to Scenario B ($2,199) if:

  • You want the flexibility to run ANY model up to 70B locally
  • You plan to use local models as a primary tool, not just supplementary
  • You want to run DeepSeek-Coder 33B or similar large coding models
  • Future-proofing matters — 64GB won't feel tight for years

The $1,200 gap between Scenario A and B buys you 10× the model size capability. Given that RAM cannot be upgraded later, erring on the side of more RAM is strongly advisable.