← Back to Articles & Artefacts
artefactssouth

Research Artefact: Polyphonic Discussion on Prompt Decomposition Engines

IAIP Research
rch-ctx-polyphonic-discussion

Research Artefact: Polyphonic Discussion on Prompt Decomposition Engines

Context: IAIP Polyphonic Research Protocol
Date: April 6, 2026
GitHub Issue: miadisabelle/Etuaptmumk-RSM#188
Topic: The intersection of Automated Prompt Engineering (APE), Computational Linguistics, and Philosophy of AI β€” specifically how prompt decomposition engines evolve from rigid, structured instructions into dynamic, conversational inquiries.


Primary Deliverables (05-revision/)

FileWordsDescription
MASTER-SURVEY-v2.md~12,100Cross-disciplinary survey spanning technical APE, computational linguistics, cognitive science, philosophy of AI, and Indigenous relational epistemology. Includes search methodology, glossary, counter-evidence section, and 12 research questions.
LITERATURE-REVIEW-v2.md~14,400Focused literature review with dual focal works: GonzΓ‘lez Arocha (2025) and Krause & Vossen (2024). Proposes 12 original research questions for graduate-level interdisciplinary research.
REVISION-NOTES.mdβ€”Documents how all 13 critique issues were addressed in the revision.

Supporting Artefacts

01-survey-raw/ β€” Wave 1 Research Agent Outputs

FileLinesAngle
01-ape-methods-evolution.md381APE technical methods, optimization pipelines, DSPy, meta-prompting
02-computational-linguistics.md371Discourse analysis, pragmatics, speech acts, RST applied to prompts
03-philosophy-of-ai.md440Phenomenology, Wittgenstein, Socratic method, dialogical AI, Indigenous epistemology
04-pde-state-of-art.md421PDE systems, architectures, benchmarks, conversational decomposition
05-researchers-universities.md491Key labs, researchers, conferences, collaboration targets

02-synthesis/ β€” Cross-Disciplinary Synthesis (v1)

FileLinesDescription
MASTER-SURVEY.md592First-pass synthesis of all 5 survey tracks. Superseded by v2.

03-literature-review/ β€” Literature Review (v1)

FileLinesDescription
LITERATURE-REVIEW.md412First-pass literature review. Superseded by v2.

04-critique/ β€” Peer Review Critique

FileLinesDescription
CRITIQUE.md5278-dimension academic critique. Composite score: 5.6/10. Identified citation fragility, thesis underdetermination, and Indigenous epistemology instrumentalization.

06-researcher-mapping/ β€” Outreach Targets

FileLinesDescription
OUTREACH-TARGETS.md189Tiered researcher/university mapping for relationship-building campaign. Montreal cluster (Concordia/Mila/McGill) identified as epicenter.

Research Protocol

This artefact was produced through a 5-wave multi-agent research protocol:

  1. MECE Decomposition β†’ 5 non-overlapping research angles
  2. Parallel Survey β†’ 5 claude-opus-4.6 agents searched independently
  3. Gap Analysis β†’ Cross-survey evaluation, no Wave 2 needed
  4. Synthesis + Literature Review β†’ 2 agents produced master survey and focused lit review
  5. Critique β†’ Revision β†’ Opus critique scored 5.6/10; opus revision addressed all 13 issues

Key Finding: The "conversational decomposition gap" β€” no framework yet optimizes prompts as part of ongoing multi-turn conversation; all current APE methods produce static artifacts. This gap is identified as an emerging trajectory, not an accomplished paradigm shift.

Focal Works:

  • GonzΓ‘lez Arocha, D. (2025). "Critical Phenomenology of Prompting in AI." Sophia, 39. DOI:10.17163/soph.n39.2025.04
  • Krause, A. & Vossen, P. (2024). "The Gricean Maxims in NLPβ€”A Survey." INLG 2024.

Total Corpus

  • 5,168 lines across 12 documents
  • ~26,500 words in revised primary deliverables
  • 130+ sources cited across technical, linguistic, philosophical, and Indigenous domains
  • 12 research questions proposed for graduate-level interdisciplinary research

EXTRA

  • TODO As we progress, look GUILLAUME.md and otherfolder to upgrade this index